The Film

About No More Baths

Keagan’s neighborhood kids have built something special — a clubhouse with a name, a president, and a real code of honor. They’ve promised not to lie, fight, insult others, or steal. But when Buzz starts bullying Danny, the oath gets tested. And when an older developer threatens Jake’s lot, the kids discover that doing the right thing requires more than good intentions.

Woven through the story is Jake — the elderly man who owns the lot — and his connection to the Civil Rights movement. When he shares his experience of the Montgomery Bus Boycott with Keagan, the film quietly asks a bigger question: what does it actually look like when one person decides to do what’s right?

What makes this film powerful for SEL is that it shows moral courage at two levels — the small, everyday kind (standing up to Buzz on the playground) and the larger, historical kind (Jake marching in Montgomery). Children see that courage isn’t one size. It shows up wherever people choose what’s right over what’s easy.

It was that experience in Montgomery that gave us the courage to move away from our people so I could go to law school and help others who would be mistreated. To me, the sweetest music in the world is the sound of children laughing as they play.
— No More Baths, Final Thoughts
Watch the Trailer
Social Emotional Learning

What Children Are Building

No More Baths is anchored in Social Awareness and Responsible Decision-Making — explored through both the small choices children make with each other every day and the larger historical example Jake carries with him.

Moral Courage

Keagan intervenes when Buzz bullies Danny — even when it would be easier to look away. Children see that courage isn’t just for big moments. It shows up in small ones too.

Dignity & Fairness

Jake’s story of the Montgomery Bus Boycott teaches that fairness isn’t just a rule — it’s something people have to fight for. Children connect the past to the present in ways that feel real.

Standing Up for Others

The oath the kids take is easy to say — harder to live. Children explore what it actually means to keep a promise to treat others well, even when the group around you isn’t.

Community & Belonging

The clubhouse is more than a hideout — it’s a model of what community can look like when people commit to something together. Children explore what makes a group worth belonging to.

Responsibility & Character

Rules without character don’t mean much. The film shows children the difference between following a code because you have to — and living it because you believe it.

Resilience & Commitment

The no-more-baths protest is easy to start and hard to sustain. Children discover that commitment isn’t just about beginning well — it’s about what you’re willing to keep doing when it gets uncomfortable, public, or costly.

Character Spotlight

Who Children Will Watch Closely

The curriculum asks children to observe characters rather than evaluate themselves — a key distinction that makes the learning land without triggering defensiveness.

Keagan
The one who acts

Keagan doesn’t wait for adults to fix things. When he sees something wrong — Buzz bullying Danny, Jake losing his lot, the school board making a bad call — he figures out what he can do and does it. But the film doesn’t let him off easy. His actions have costs, complications, and unintended consequences. Acting on principle is harder than it looks.

“What keeps Keagan moving forward — and when does standing up for someone else become about something bigger than just them?”

Jake
The one who already paid the price

Jake owns a lot, tends a cemetery, watches children play, and carries a past the kids don’t fully understand. He marched in Montgomery. He lost his family. He built something. And now a developer wants to erase it. Jake’s choices — to stay, to refuse, to let the kids fight for him — show students what it looks like when someone has already figured out what they believe.

“Jake knows what’s right — and he’s already risked everything for it once. Why does he stay quiet when the court could help him?”